Nick’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
There is a new feature called Postmark’s Retention Add-on, which is being introduced by Postmark. It provides everything you need for sending application emails, processing inbound email, and tracking user engagement. Postmark is being compared to Mailgun, and it claims to offer exceptional deliverability as a standard feature. They provide reliable and secure services and have separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk email. Postmark offers features such as SMTP, REST API, comprehensive official and community libraries, spam score checking, bounce handling, and more. They also have separate environments with servers, pre-made email templates, template engine, inbox preview, scheduled delivery, A/B testing, and email address validation. Postmark provides detailed analytics and retention features, including delivery rates, bounce rates, open rates, click tracking, unsubscribe tracking, spam rates, and more. They also offer exceptional support through various channels like email, live chat, and call. Postmark retains more helpful details about the event history and content of messages compared to Mailgun. They offer 45 days of detailed message activity and full content storage. Postmark provides pre-built and fully-tested email templates and offers comprehensive guides on best practices for configuration, usability, engagement, copywriting, and more. They also have a tool called MailMason to streamline building and updating transactional emails. Postmark has great customer support and offers troubleshooting capabilities and extensive documentation. Their pricing plans are based on the number of emails per month, and they accept various payment methods. Postmark allows sending bulk marketing emails through their Message Streams feature. They also offer high-volume plans and dedicated IPs for high-volume senders. Postmark is recommended by many customers who have switched from services like Mailgun. They emphasize great deliverability and offer extensive support, documentation, and troubleshooting capabilities. Postmark also provides exceptional customer satisfaction and great support for both small and high-volume senders. They claim to provide faster and reliable delivery and share live delivery data for transparency. Postmark also offers pre-built templates, customizable templates, and a migration guide for switching from Mailgun to their service. They have thousands of companies as customers and strive to end deliverability issues.
Tina’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
Postmark and Mailgun are two email service providers that are worth considering if you are looking for a reliable option. This comparison guide will provide an overview of the pros and cons of each platform, as well as their pricing, features, and customer reviews.
When it comes to features, both Postmark and Mailgun offer SDKs for various programming languages, such as JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, and more. They also provide integration with Courier.com, which allows for seamless communication between the email service provider and other platforms. In terms of the threshold for free plans and dedicated IP, Mailgun allows for 5,000 messages per month and 300 messages per day for the free plan. They also offer paid plans with access to a dedicated IP and the ability to send between 50,000 to 100,000 emails per month, depending on the plan. On the other hand, Postmark offers various plans with different maximum email limits, ranging from 10,000 to 5 million. However, customers sending up to 300,000 emails per month can use a dedicated IP address with an additional cost of $50 per month.
Moving on to pricing, both platforms offer affordable options. Mailgun’s pricing starts at $0.8 per month for up to 1,000 emails, and goes up to $50 per month for up to 50,000 emails. Postmark’s pricing starts at $10 per month for up to 1,000 emails, and goes up to $50 per month for up to 50,000 emails.
Now, let’s talk about the pros and cons of each platform. Mailgun is known for being easy to set up, offering extensive and well-documented APIs, and providing support for email marketing. However, some users have reported spotty historical reliability and poor support since its acquisition. Postmark, on the other hand, is praised for its ease of use in setting up, delivering, and parsing transactional emails at scale. It also provides troubleshooting and analytics tools. However, it has a 45-day access limit to email history and does not offer yearly pricing or support for lists and visual template builders.
In terms of company information, Mailgun has an Alexa rank of 3,998, received $51.1 million in funding, has 250 employees, and was founded in 2010. Its headquarters is in San Antonio, USA, and it has a Trustpilot rating of 4.3 and a G2 rating of 4.5. Postmark has an Alexa rank of 19,049, received no funding information, has 20 employees, and was also founded in 2010. Its headquarters is in Philadelphia, USA, and it has a Trustpilot rating of 3.8 and a G2 rating of 4.6.
To recap, Mailgun is the most popular and established option, with the most funding and highly-rated reputation. It is also the cheapest option for both small and bigger plans. On the other hand, Postmark is praised for its ease of use and troubleshooting tools.
In conclusion, both Mailgun and Postmark have their strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. We hope this guide has provided you with valuable information to make an informed decision. If you need more information or personalized recommendations, please feel free to contact us via live chat or email.
Steve’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
In this blog post, we will be discussing Postmark versus Mailgun as email providers. The author is currently looking for a new email provider because their emails sent through Sendgrid are ending up in users’ spam folders. They have done some research and have found that many people recommend either Postmark or Mailgun. However, they are unsure which one to choose or if there may be another option that is better suited for their needs.
Upon researching, the author has found that Postmark has better deliverability, but it is also more expensive. One drawback they have noticed about Postmark is that there is no built-in way to maintain a mailing list within the platform. This can be a disadvantage for those who need to send bulk emails such as newsletters. On the other hand, Mailgun does offer a way to maintain mailing lists, which can be convenient for this purpose.
When it comes to the API, the author has observed that the mailgun-js client appears to be more popular than Postmark’s client. However, they have not delved too deeply into this aspect.
The author then poses a question to the readers: Which email provider do they prefer and why? They are seeking thoughts and opinions from others who may have experience using either Postmark or Mailgun.
The post ends with a list of popular topics on Reddit, ranging from gaming and sports to business and crypto. These topics are not directly related to the discussion of Postmark versus Mailgun and may be unrelated to the overall theme of the post.
In summary, the author is in search of a new email provider and is considering either Postmark or Mailgun. They have found that Postmark has better deliverability but lacks a built-in way to maintain a mailing list, while Mailgun offers this functionality. The author is also curious about the popularity of the API clients for each provider. They invite readers to share their preferences and reasons for choosing one provider over the other.
Rick’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
Mailgun and Postmark are both transactional email tools that offer APIs for sending, receiving, tracking, and storing email. Mailgun provides features like optimized queue, scheduled delivery, and MIME assembly, while Postmark allows for creating virtual servers, easy code integration, and email tracking.
When comparing the two tools, one of the main reasons developers prefer Mailgun is its quick email integration. It is liked by over 177 developers for its ease of use and seamless integration with other systems. On the other hand, Postmark is known for its simplicity, with users mentioning its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup process.
In terms of popularity and usage, Mailgun is used by popular companies like Reddit, Slack, and Lyft, and is mentioned in 1490 company stacks and 268 developer stacks. Postmark, on the other hand, is used by Swat.io, Docplanner, and Walls.io, and is listed in 67 company stacks and 15 developer stacks. Mailgun has a broader approval and wider usage in the industry.
In a discussion thread, developers sought advice on which tool to choose for transactional emails and maintaining email templates. Some developers recommended Twilio SendGrid for time-sensitive emails and its ability to do dynamic templates and bulk sending. Others recommended using Postmark for its ease of use and quick feedback on debugging issues. Mandrill, owned by MailChimp, was also mentioned as a reliable tool for beautiful email templates.
In separate discussions, developers shared their experiences with using Mailgun and Postmark. One developer who chose Postmark mentioned its laser-focus on transactional email and reliability with delivering emails. They also appreciated Postmark’s developer-friendly documentation and easy integration with existing code. Another developer who migrated from Mailgun to Postmark mentioned the lag and delivery issues they experienced with Mailgun, whereas Postmark provided a faster and more reliable service.
Overall, the choice between Mailgun and Postmark depends on the specific needs and preferences of the developer. While Mailgun offers quick email integration, Postmark stands out for its simplicity and reliability. Developers should consider factors like ease of integration with existing systems, pricing, and features like email template management when making a decision.
Beth’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
The blog writer is summarizing a comparison between two transactional email API services, Sinch Mailgun and Postmark. Sinch Mailgun was originally owned by Rackspace and is now supported by Sinch through its acquisition of Mailgun and Mailjet. Postmark is a product from Wildbit in Philadelphia.
In terms of pricing, Sinch Mailgun offers different editions and modules ranging from $35 per month for the Foundation edition to $90 per month for the Scale edition. They also have a free Flex edition that offers 10,000 emails per month. On the other hand, Postmark has a pricing structure based on the number of emails per month, starting at $10 for 10,000 emails per month and going up to $1,200 for 5,000,000 emails per month.
When it comes to user ratings, Sinch Mailgun has a score of 7.7 out of 10, while Postmark has a score of 9.7 out of 10. Users have mentioned that Postmark has excellent deliverability rates and a user-friendly interface. However, some users have had issues with the customer service of Sinch Mailgun and its reliability during outages.
In terms of usability, Sinch Mailgun users have mentioned that its SMTP is easy to use and integrates well with various content management systems and frameworks. They have also praised its free tier for startups and small companies. On the other hand, Postmark users have appreciated its user interface and the ability to have multiple virtual email servers.
Users have reported that Sinch Mailgun has good scalability and can handle increased email volumes without requiring code changes. It has also been praised for its pricing, which scales naturally with business growth. Postmark users have seen a significant increase in deliverability rates after switching to the service. Some users have mentioned that it has the best deliverability among various email service providers they have used.
Overall, both Sinch Mailgun and Postmark have their strengths and weaknesses. Sinch Mailgun offers a more affordable pricing structure and a free tier for startups. However, some users have had issues with its customer service. On the other hand, Postmark has excellent deliverability rates and a user-friendly interface, but it is pricier compared to other options. Ultimately, the choice between the two services depends on individual needs and priorities.
Jim’s Review of Postmark Vs Mailgun
In this blog post, we will be comparing two popular transactional email software options: Mailgun and Postmark.
Mailgun is an email API service that is designed to help developers with their email sending, receiving, and tracking procedures in a simple and efficient manner. It offers features such as personalization, segmentation, and A/B testing to optimize email marketing processes. With Mailgun, users can easily integrate SMTP and HTTP API to send emails in bulk. The software also provides SPF, DMARC, and DKIM customizations to protect against bad actors. Additionally, Mailgun offers features like automatic email parsing, validation API to reduce invalid sign-ups, and email templates for streamlined collaboration between teams. It seamlessly integrates with other platforms like Omnisend, infobip, and customer.io to create marketing campaigns and enhance overall engagement.
On the other hand, Postmark is a fast and reliable email delivery service that is trusted by businesses of all sizes. It offers a powerful email API that makes it easy for companies to send high-quality emails. Postmark allows users to organize their transactional emails into logical groups called servers and provides guidance on setting up records to protect domain reputation. The service also ensures quick and easy email delivery and supports TLS protocol to secure data transmission between applications and servers. Postmark provides real-time integrations with platforms like Mailcoach, Craft Campaign, Craft CMS, and Figma.
When it comes to features, both Mailgun and Postmark offer a range of functionalities that can help users optimize their email sending and delivery processes. These include A/B testing, automated IP warmup, custom metadata, custom spam filters, dashboards for reporting and analytics, email personalization, email suppression, email tag, multi-factor authentication, predesigned email templates, real-time reporting, SMTP relay, template management, and webhooks. Both software options also offer various pricing plans to cater to different user needs and budgets.
Mailgun offers plans such as Flex, Foundation, Growth, Scale, and Enterprise. The Flex plan provides 5,000 free emails per month for the first three months and then offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model. The Foundation, Growth, Scale, and Enterprise plans offer different tiers of emails included and additional features such as dedicated IPs, SAML SSO, send time optimization, and managed deliverability services.
Postmark, on the other hand, offers plans such as Developer, Basic, and Enterprise. The Developer plan is free and offers 100 test emails per month. The Basic plan offers different tiers of emails per month, ranging from 10,000 to 5,000,000, with customizable add-ons such as dedicated IPs. The Enterprise plan caters to specific user requirements and offers additional features such as managed deliverability services and rapid fire burst sending SLA.
In terms of technical details, both Mailgun and Postmark offer access monitoring and support options such as 24/7 live representatives, business hours support, and online resources like documentation. They also provide APIs for seamless integration with other systems and offer cloud-based deployment options. Mailgun and Postmark support various platforms, including web, mobile (Android, iOS, Windows), and desktop (Windows, Mac).
Overall, both Mailgun and Postmark are reliable and robust transactional email software options. They offer a range of features to optimize email sending and delivery processes, and their pricing plans cater to different user needs and budgets. Users can choose the software that best fits their specific requirements and integrates seamlessly with their existing systems.
