Mailerq Vs Mailgun

Email Marketing Platforms

Mailerq Vs Mailgun

Nick’s Review of Mailerq Vs Mailgun

As a blog writer, I want to introduce Mailgun as a great alternative to Mandrill for businesses in need of email marketing services, especially for transactional email. Unlike Mandrill, Mailgun is not tied to a Mailchimp account, making it a more flexible choice for users. One of the standout features of Mailgun is its email verification service, which is designed to improve open rates and protect sender reputation. This ensures transactional email delivery and prevents blocklisting or throttling by email providers like Google’s Gmail. Mailgun also offers superior customer service compared to Mandrill, with 24/7/365 accessibility and dedicated email experts for each client. In terms of pricing, Mandrill can be expensive and requires a MailChimp account, while Mailgun offers a range of pricing plans to match different needs and budgets.

From a developer’s perspective, Mailgun is a great option as it focuses on simplicity and meeting compliance standards. It offers features like email verification, inbound email routing, and email analytics. Mailgun also provides extensive resources including guides, podcasts, videos, and case studies to help users make the most of their email marketing program. Overall, Mailgun is a reliable and developer-friendly alternative to Mandrill that offers top-notch features, excellent customer service, and flexible pricing options.

Tina’s Review of Mailerq Vs Mailgun

In a recent post on the Ghost Forum, a user expressed their dissatisfaction with using Mailgun for email sending and asked for alternatives. They found Mailgun to be overpriced and wanted to explore other options that could be more cost-effective. The user mentioned that they were using DigitalOcean and were looking for a “set it and forget it” solution on a separate server.

Another user responded to the post and shared an article that explained why Mailgun is required for newsletters in Ghost. The article stated that while Mailgun is not mandatory for using Ghost, if a user chooses not to use it, they would need to rely on an external service for bulk email sending, such as newsletters.

Another user defended Mailgun, stating that while it may seem expensive compared to other providers like AWS, it offers reliability and clean IPs. They also mentioned that using an external email service would defeat the purpose of using Ghost’s native newsletter feature.

The original poster expressed their dissatisfaction with the default cost of $35 for Mailgun and sought a cheaper alternative that could replace Mailgun for $5-10 a month. They mentioned using an SMTP server and asked for suggestions on how to configure Ghost to use it for email sending.

A user suggested the Mailgun Flex plan, which offers pricing starting at $0.80 for 1k emails, but was unsure if there is an upper limit. They reiterated that Ghost supports using an SMTP mailer for transactional emails and that Mailgun is only required for bulk email through Ghost.

The original poster sought clarification on how Ghost handles newsletter emails and how often they are sent out. They expressed concerns about sending out emails containing all the posts from a day or week and questioned if it was necessary for their use case. They also mentioned an alternative tool called Postal that claims to be similar to Mailgun and perform the same functions.

Another user explained that Ghost allows users to send posts to some or all of their subscribers, but newsletters are not sent automatically. The user reassured the original poster that if they don’t need or want the bulk email feature, they can use an SMTP server instead of Mailgun.

A user highlighted the distinction between transactional emails and bulk emails in Ghost. Transactional emails are for actions like signing up or logging in, while bulk emails are sent out to all members at once, typically in the form of a newsletter. They mentioned that Mailgun is the only supported provider for bulk emails, but users can use any provider for transactional emails.

The original poster expressed frustration with their unsuccessful attempt to sign up for Mailgun due to their Mexican phone number. They questioned whether they could still use Ghost’s bulk email feature and if there was a workaround. They mentioned having their own mail server and wanting to integrate it with Ghost’s bulk mailer.

One user suggested that the original poster could dump all the collected member emails and upload them to their own email provider to send emails. They explained that Mailgun primarily supports newsletters and transactional emails.

Another user suggested using webhooks to route emails to a custom service that can compose and send emails using the user’s own email server. They gave an example of how this setup could work, mentioning that they use a similar approach for Telegram channels.

Another user pointed out that building a custom solution using webhooks would not provide access to Ghost’s newsletter facility. They emphasized that Ghost already has built-in capabilities for newsletters, and using an external service may not be necessary.

The discussion continued with more users sharing their experiences and suggestions. Some users raised concerns about the security of Mailgun accounts and their own negative experiences with the service. Others emphasized the flexibility of Ghost as an open-source platform, stating that almost anything is possible with customization.

In summary, the discussion on the Ghost Forum revolved around alternatives to Mailgun for email sending in Ghost. Users explored options like using an SMTP server, finding cheaper alternatives, and building custom solutions using webhooks. While Mailgun is the recommended provider for bulk emails in Ghost, users discussed workarounds and highlighted the flexibility of the platform for customization.

Steve’s Review of Mailerq Vs Mailgun

In this blog post, we will be discussing the pros and cons of two popular mail service APIs: MailerQ and Mailgun. Both of these services provide extensive reporting capabilities, making them excellent choices for businesses that require detailed insights into their email campaigns.

Let’s start by looking at MailerQ. MailerQ is known for its powerful API and excellent deliverability rates. With MailerQ, you can have complete control over your email sending process and customize it according to your specific needs. Additionally, MailerQ offers robust reporting features that allow you to track and analyze the performance of your emails. You can monitor metrics such as open rates, click-through rates, bounce rates, and more. This level of detailed reporting can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of your email campaigns and help you make data-driven decisions.

On the other hand, we have Mailgun. Mailgun is another popular mail service API that offers a wide range of features and integrations. Like MailerQ, Mailgun provides detailed reporting capabilities, allowing you to track various metrics related to your email campaigns. You can monitor delivery rates, bounce rates, spam complaints, and more. Mailgun also offers real-time email tracking, so you can see exactly when a recipient opens your email or clicks on a link. This level of visibility can be invaluable for understanding recipient engagement and optimizing your email campaigns.

When comparing MailerQ and Mailgun, it’s important to consider their pricing structures. MailerQ offers flexible pricing options based on your email volume, while Mailgun has a tiered pricing model that includes different plans with varying features and usage limits. It’s essential to evaluate your business’s email sending needs and budget to determine which service would be the most cost-effective for you.

In terms of ease of use, both MailerQ and Mailgun provide user-friendly interfaces and comprehensive documentation to help you get started. However, it’s worth noting that Mailgun has a more extensive knowledge base and community forum, making it easier to find answers to any questions or issues you may encounter.

Ultimately, the choice between MailerQ and Mailgun will depend on your specific requirements and preferences. If you value complete control over your email sending process and need extensive reporting capabilities, MailerQ may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you prioritize a wide range of features, integrations, and a robust support community, Mailgun could be the right choice.

In conclusion, both MailerQ and Mailgun are reputable mail service APIs that offer detailed reporting features. They are suitable for businesses that require comprehensive insights into their email campaigns. By carefully considering your business’s specific needs and comparing the features and pricing of both services, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your goals and budget.

Rick’s Review of Mailerq Vs Mailgun

In a blog post by Jorge Manrubia, he discusses the use of Mailgun as a mail provider for sending emails in Rails applications via Action Mailer. Mailgun offers two interfaces: SMTP and an HTTP API. While the SMTP approach works well for most cases, it becomes challenging when attempting to send emails in batches with Mailgun using recipient variables. Recipient variables are substitutions that need to be made for each individual recipient, and using them in SMTP requires a specific MIME format that is not easy to achieve in Rails.

To overcome this issue, Manrubia created an adapter called mailgun_rails that allows developers to use Action Mailer with Mailgun. This adapter supports Mailgun-specific features like recipient variables and custom variables, which can be received via Mailgun webhooks. It also supports sending HTML and/or text messages, depending on how the Action Mailer message is composed.

Manrubia provides an example of how to use the adapter, showing how to set the sender, recipients, subject, and Mailgun variables:

email = mail from: ‘[email protected]’,
to: [‘[email protected]’, ‘[email protected]’],
subject: ‘Hey, this is a test email’

email.mailgun_variables = {name_1: :value_1, :name_2 => value_2}
email.mailgun_recipient_variables = {‘[email protected]’: {id: 1}, ‘[email protected]’: {id: 2}}

With the mailgun_rails adapter, developers can easily integrate Mailgun into their Rails applications and take advantage of its features for sending personalized batch emails. More information about the adapter can be found on the GitHub page.

Overall, this adapter provides a solution to the limitations of using Mailgun with Action Mailer via SMTP when it comes to sending emails in batches. It simplifies the process and allows for the use of recipient and custom variables with ease. Developers can now benefit from the powerful features of Mailgun while using the familiar Action Mailer framework.

Beth’s Review of Mailerq Vs Mailgun

In this blog post, we will be discussing MailerQ vs Mailgun, two popular email delivery solutions for WordPress. Mailgun is a service designed specifically to help your emails get delivered successfully. It is a reliable email service provider that can scale to support large quantities of emails and uses a secure API. MailerQ, on the other hand, is an email delivery software developed by Copernica, a marketing software company.

To get started with Mailgun, you need to sign up for an account on their website. They offer a free account without a credit card, which is restricted to sending to only 5 authorized recipients and allows up to 5,000 emails per month for 3 months. Beyond that, pricing starts at $0.80 per 1,000 emails. It is recommended to use a domain-specific email address for the most reliable email delivery.

Once you have signed up for an account, you will need to verify your domain. This requires adding DNS records to your site’s DNS settings. Mailgun provides detailed instructions on how to add these records and verify your domain. The verification process may take some time as DNS records can take time to update.

After verifying your domain, you can set up Mailgun with WP Mail SMTP, a popular WordPress plugin that allows you to send emails using an SMTP server. In the plugin settings, you will need to enter your Mailgun API key and domain information. You can find your API key in your Mailgun account. Once you have entered this information and saved the settings, you can send a test email to ensure everything is working properly.

MailerQ, on the other hand, is a more advanced email delivery solution that requires manual installation and configuration. It is not as user-friendly as Mailgun and may require more technical knowledge to set up. However, it offers more control and customization options compared to Mailgun.

In summary, Mailgun is a reliable and scalable email delivery service that can be easily integrated with WP Mail SMTP. It offers competitive pricing and requires DNS access to set up. MailerQ is a more advanced email delivery solution that requires manual installation and configuration but offers more control and customization options. Both Mailgun and MailerQ are popular choices for reliable email delivery in WordPress.

Avatar photo

Through his pioneering work in email marketing, SMTP server management, and system administration, Dan Parker has left an enduring mark on the industry. His expertise has enabled countless businesses to achieve their email marketing goals, driving revenue and customer engagement. His dedication to staying at the forefront of technological advancements has made him a role model for aspiring professionals in these fields.

Today, Dan continues to consult with businesses, sharing his knowledge and helping them stay at the cutting edge of email marketing and system administration. His career is a testament to the power of dedication, innovation, and a passion for technology, and he remains an influential figure in the world of email marketing and IT infrastructure.

Back To Top